Inside a China readiness report
Every recommendation is backed by a measurement. Here is the exact structure you receive.
A readiness report is only useful if every claim in it traces back to evidence. Ours is built so you can defend each recommendation to your own stakeholders. Here is the structure you receive.
Executive summary
One page: the readiness verdict, the top risks, the recommended route, and a timeline. Written for the person who approves the budget, not the person who reads the appendix.
China access baseline
DNS, time-to-first-byte, page load, and API reliability — all measured from mainland nodes, not simulated. This is the “before” picture every later recommendation is measured against.
Dependency risk table
Every third-party service, its observed China behavior, and the remediation option. For most teams this is the single most useful page in the report.
Compliance trigger screen
Filing, data, and category triggers — flagged from your actual product, not guessed from your industry label.
Route recommendation
Acceleration, hosting, proxy, distribution, or an honest no-go — with a concrete 30/60/90 plan attached.
